分类: 2025

  • 静止的瞬间

    卢米埃尔的影像捕捉了生活的瞬时之美,从诞生之初,电影便作为生命的延展而存在。时间,是电影当之无愧的亲密伴侣——它亲切地依偎在侧,却也时常悄然走开。

    该如何相信时间依偎的神奇呢?蔡明亮作为保留时间的魔术师,已然承认了视线的珍贵。他正在并持续的用镜头模拟双眼观测,找寻电影院中的魂灵。附身?的确,电影是附身的艺术,他经常变换着姿态去游荡并无私地抚摸着景观的肌肤,我们应当为《不散》(2003)剧终时撑着伞走出的人喜悦,只因她分明就是蔡明亮自身——一个爱着世界万物的人。至少对电影院那样钟情(不仅仅是《龙门客栈》(1967)的客串)就可以被视作是阿彼察邦的朋友。在如此虚拟的时代,还有多少人仍在赞美静止并慵懒地打发时间呢?我们缺少听完一首歌,看完一个镜头的勇气,甚至连被异化的人也在质疑固定镜头的动人。我至今仍难以忘怀,《维塔利娜·瓦雷拉》(Vitalina Varela , 2019)的结尾:蓝天之下,一对夫妻的灵魂亲密而率真地互动。这无疑是科斯塔的“骗局”,但这“欺骗”本身却因思念引发的深沉感怀而显得无比真诚。

    Vitalina Varela


    在推拉摇移之后,没有多少人再去追求静止本身形体的优美,他们更是在无休止的眩晕中拒绝了时间的拜访。注意,我并不是在反对镜头运动,而是反对形如达内在《年轻母亲之家》(Jeunes mères ,2025)中,那对徒劳的手持镜头进行的、过于自我的强行介入。阿彼察邦早已用《幻梦墓园》(รักที่ขอนแก่น , 2015)为我们指导如何阅读电影,从各个视角观察的病室丝毫没有痛苦的污染,反而是灯光(几乎做到无意的点染)坠入了每一个生命的躯体。在如此大范围的工作面前,每一次出镜和入镜都显得尤为重要,营造出在不忘却联结的情况下欣赏一副长卷的氛围。五十岚耕平也通过呼吸一座滨海酒店的气息与查看图鉴发现了时间的意义,他既可以在《屏息如爱人》(息を殺して , 2014)中轻松的融合时空,也可以在《永远超级幸福》(Super Happy Forever , 2024)的细致考察间找到似曾相识的感动,这几乎是对《让娜·迪尔曼》(Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles , 1975)用枯燥结构生活的轻盈化的阐述。


    时间如何走开呢?我们当然要知道他作为潜行者本身的意义。洪常秀在保持日记式写作的同时也注意到这一点,因此他轻爽地允许“无意义”的时间,这几乎是思索性的嘀咕,给我们同样留下了想象下一步对话的小憩场所。在《大自然对你说了什么》(그 자연이 네게 뭐라고 하니 , 2025)中他记录了失足的瞬间,在《旅行者的需求》(여행자의 필요 , 2024)中,他记录了于佩尔用翻译软件欣赏诗文的沉迷。更是在太多他的影像中,他故意地强调视力的下降,可以说,他借助影像让“现实的时间”放松了警惕,从而得以逃逸,近乎是毫无防备的把观众迎入他温暖的襁褓。这不禁使我想到让-克劳德·卢梭(Jean-Claude Rousseau)通过步行(循序移动)完成的与时间的对话,更激进的表达便是《法兰西反自动化》(La France contre les robots , 2020)两种时间的共同革命,并以此完成言语的形象塑造。

    息を殺して

    静止的镜头为我们搭建了与传统戏剧异质性的画面。它也许模仿着德莱叶(Carl Theodor Dreyer)舞台位移的路径,但带来的对于空间的纯粹感发却是自在的,这便是奥利维拉(Manoel de Oliveira)用连贯展现的深邃的氛围,和以沉稳的态度不断丰满的思绪。长镜头搭建的平台必定是让时间与我们同在的连环画。在这样痴迷的观看中,哪怕是静止的瞬间,依然是美妙的。

  • 论勘探

    电影绝非单纯是角色的感发表演,其身旁的景观会一直进行活性的伴奏。于是从地质学的剖析(这是最基础的勘探)到景观与人物的相映成趣,我们能够执着的如同观看《地球脉动》(Planet Earth)一样勘察地表,而不会将其作为构图的附庸。

    拉克谢(Óliver Laxe)在《接近终点》(Sirât , 2025)中的观察精神绝不会比班宁(James Benning)或者斯诺(Michael Snow)逊色多少。就像班宁在《daylight》中仰视月球一般,拉克谢用眼睛敬视大地,荒漠的模样成为了最忠诚的伙伴,因为它在时刻强调“辽阔”与“庄严”。相反,《碟中谍8:最终清算》(Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning , 2025)在场景的轮番上演下失去了与地表的联系,而仅由勘探的形式模拟见证,成为幻灯片格式的“奇观加法”。

    导演必须敬畏电影中的景观,因为勘探景观的工作也是接受给予的过程。雷斯夫妇(António Reis & Margarida Cordeiro)在《海美》(Jaime , 1974)中记录的山坡与《沙漠玫瑰》(Rosa de Ariea , 1989)永远无私地参与摄制的草地和岩石都不会是创生的产物。当然,正源于景观本身的客观性,我们能够自然地且不假思索地相信他们,并联结更加形而上意味的星空或是神圣的大地。

    Rosa de Ariea

    在《达成共识》(Coming to Terms , 2013)中,约斯特(Jon Jost)由人联想到景观,他甚至认为人也是景观的一部分,于是勘探被赋予了医生的工作,并成功发现面部与森林的联系。人会在多么尊重的境界才会发现勘探的普遍性!

    当导演沉迷于勘探,任何焦点之外的场景都会让位给痴迷的注视。正像《眼睛不想一直闭着或者也许有一天轮到罗马自己选择》(Othon ,1970)中现代街道与舞台剧本身的对比被连续的观察消解,我们在被对话吸引下早已参与了这一场表演,而忘记了相对虚假的环境。布景在一定程度上能够实现离散所引起的分心,但即便是考察人造景观也需要耗费持续的精力,如果我们主观地漠视勘探之外的情节,这并不会带来痴迷意味的注视,因为这样的感官永远是逼迫而非自愿的。于伊耶(Danièle Huillet)在引导我们接受时空的错杂,并积极地参与到历史的排演中。同样,大卫林奇(David Lynch)在《内陆帝国》(Inland Empire , 2006)中的场景分析中找到了每个世界的联系,它当然可以觉察出每一个景观的属性。

    Othon

    相似场景的勘探更加彻底,并容易排除由混杂带来的干扰。特琪亚(Tariq Teguia)用身体接触地表,真正地贴向了大地,减少脱离乡土气息的陌生。阿克曼(Chantal Akerman)则作为旅人的姿态,将视线持续投向洋面中的纽约,我们并不能断定她究竟观察到了什么结果,但正是这种勘探(区别与斯诺的《Cityscape》的散视)赞扬了纯粹的观测工作,把一个个封闭的场域逐层展开,并发现对象的本质。

    在电影中,人物和景观的对话事实上是最难以察觉的,并且被大多数导演避开,这会引向两者一定程度的割裂或是单纯的加法。里维特(Jacques Rivette)说:“任何试图用加法代替综合,用分析代替统一,都会引向一种与电影无关的形式修辞。”这不由得我们想到其在《出局》(Out 1, noli me tangere  , 1971)的实践,角色们深入城市肌理的漫游和追寻,正是对剧场与现实环境之间复杂对话的积极勘探。与之相似的,洛登(Barbara Loden)在旺达(Wanda , 1970)中将的飘零模样与周遭的景观深度融合,以至于她把自己化成了煤石堆中一个弱小的白色生灵,清晰地展示了人物与环境之间达到高度“综合”的罕见状态,从而完成了对情感空间和物理空间的双重融入。

    在勘探的这一最终层面,无论是对地质形态的亲切研究,还是对抽象空间的痴迷注视,其核心都在于认识外表的特点,并寻求人置身于景观中的独特姿态。它用结果考验着所有参与者(演员、导演,乃至观众)的专注与敬畏之心。正是这种专注,使得电影不再是简单的叙事机器,而成为了一场持续的、对世界“给予”的接受过程。斯特劳布-于伊耶会这样探问工作情况,科斯塔(Pedro Costa)、五十岚耕平(Kohei Igarashi)和潘佩罗小组当然也会这么做。

  • Musiciné N°8 “back and forth”

    Content

    • On Wang Bing and Pedro Costa
    • One Battle After Another review
    • New albums

    On Wang Bing and Pedro Costa

    Jack Chain

    I recently went back to read the Metrograph interview with Wang Bing and Pedro Costa. Since I’m interested in both of them, I figured it was time to write down my thoughts on their films.

    Director Wang Bing is someone who dares to rebel against the film system and yearns for freedom. In stark contrast to Lou Ye’s films, which seem suspended, Wang Bing’s cinema is rooted in the land, sincerely conversing with every “actor.” I put “actor” in quotation marks because of the very nature of documentary filmmaking—each person filmed is their own storyteller, possessing a dynamic individuality. I recall Chantal Akerman using a panning shot in D’Est (1993) to film a line of people, men and women, young and old, their expressions almost identical. But Akerman is masterful; the documentary itself maintains an observational stance, making it hard to directly inject one’s own emotion. Yet, she skillfully handles the camera usage. Did she know each person well? She didn’t even have time to get to know them. But it is precisely through these repeated moments of stopping, shifting, that the act of filming itself becomes a diary, an emotional record. Wang Bing is similar. He may not know the names of everyone in the Huzhou children’s clothing factory, but he embeds a trigger, allowing the emotions of the subjects to infect the audience’s feelings. This is difficult for a large group of extras to manage, and Wang Bing’s camera serves as an auxiliary text in this regard. Some might feel this relies on the actors’ resonance rather than Wang Bing, but I’d argue that if Wang Bing were limited to just following or fixing the camera, he would absolutely not achieve this effect. In the undulations of the camera, our heartbeats synchronize with all the crew members.

    Tie Xi Qu: West Of The Tracks by Wang Bing

    I didn’t get to know Director Costa early. At the time, I was lucky enough to find the film resource for O Sangue (1989), but frankly, I wasn’t very interested in him then, although looking back now, some of the lighting choices truly surprise me. Later, I watched Juventude em Marcha (2003) , and at the time, I didn’t recognize its significance, but the experimental nature he displayed (determined by his camera type and style) was astonishing and groundbreaking. I have a few photographs that imitate the low-angle shots of Ventura, but in reality, that fusion of distortion and reality was not built unintentionally. Furthermore, the extended composition intends to expand the depth of vision. Even in the narrow alleys, the writing of real-life scenes flows through, making the overall content exceptionally rich, just as we might use the corner of a wall as a screen to reveal the true intended expression. At the same time, this is inseparable from the core meaning of Costa’s work—humanitarian concern—which is in opposition to Béla Tarr and resonates with Akerman, and can even be said to possess more real-world significance than the habitually rigorous Straub-Huillet. The effective use of static shots allows us to observe the whole picture, as if continuously watching a smoker—we can see the smoke exhale from their mouth, gradually unfurl, and finally disappear into the air. This calm probing makes it difficult for the camera to even fully grasp the living landscape of Lisbon, and the open embrace is more like the drifting yet clear posture of a documentary, present in every field that is presented.

    Juventude em Marcha by Pedro Costa

    Wang Bing and Costa: one challenges the existing system, eager to display freedom; the other has relevant experience but, as an exile, they both chronicle the overlooked. Wang Bing is uncovering a group of people, while Costa is blowing up a type of person by taking cross-sections of a few individuals.


    One Battle After Another review

    Jack Chain

    The extremely strong sense of discontinuity, I wonder if it is meant to depict the shifting transformation of the landscape, but it seems more like PTA’s (Paul Thomas Anderson’s) experimentation with style. We can see echoes of Vertigo and Lost Highway, as well as familiar techniques like blurring and close-ups. The unity of convergence and divergence maintains the purpose of all connections, and the pursuit and stasis conceal the geological structure of the space. However, the clumsy cleverness relying on sound to attract attention reveals a lack of confidence in time, even betraying a slight sense of panic.

    One Battle After Another by Paul Thomas Anderson


    New Albums

    Trying Not to Have a Thought

    Genre: rock

    Release time: 9/12/2025

    The Beneficial Society

    Genre: rock

    Release time: 9/26/2025

    Internet

    Genre: rock

    Release time: 9/24/2025

  • Musiciné N°6

    June 2025, Issue 6 in total

    Catalogue

    • Weekly scoring table(6.16-6.22)
    • Long comment: The mediocre performance of Ne Zha2(2025)
    • Music recommendation
    • Short comment: The Square(2017):Some Chaos

    Part One

    Weekly scoring table(Total score 5 points)

    Part Two

    《哪吒2:魔童闹海》(2025)影评

    作者:Jack Chain


    巨大的粘贴之物  空荡的精神之墙

    一、结构上的单一

    这部电影将流水线电影的特色尽情地展现出来,我们可以从最后的大战中看出许多类似的正邪相逆的反转,这并不是源于一时的突发奇想,而是惯常的有限“可知”带来的无意义辉煌,这并不稀奇,许多导演都想利用与观众信息的非对称来悄悄地埋下碎片,而让观众在回看中获得虚假的乐趣,这种办法很有效,即它在设计一场看似无意识的互动,而最致命的代价便是其作者性的缺失。在我们不断地寻到几个伏笔而大为称赞后,这恍然已成了“非电影”,即呈现而非对谈,被诠释而非超越。

    回到结构上的谈论,在我看来,围攻陈塘关的剧情并不与结尾的大战有多大差别,可见导演只是不断地使用已有的模板,在粘贴式的创作中装作努力的姿态。而当真正地删去冗杂的片段,便难以自保了。为了保持情节的推进(形式上的超越)来为人物后续的相似行为提供合理的动机,导演多会动用自己的“巧思”来加深观众对影片的误解,甚至荒唐的构建不必要的联结。因此便有了成就结局的反转之“神奇”的陈塘关被毁之谜,暂不论剧情的合理性(因为这种插叙都出于精心设计),仅谈及导演对结构上的些许创新,都不如沙马兰的《陷阱(Trap)》(2024)中男主逃脱的方法巧妙,不仅感叹沙马兰能够发明出各种精妙绝伦的设计(即便是愚蠢的)。

    二、性格的伪升华

    在经历中,我们得以获得个人成长,即便外表并无大异,内心也早已发生翻天覆地的变化。《哪吒2》却反其道而行之,导致殷夫人变成仙丹的情节只是作为哪吒换一副形态的无端的动机,我们从结尾也辨不出哪吒到底改变了什么?前文提到的友情(与木吒、金吒之间)以及闪回中提到的亲情都只是无关痛痒的部分。导演尽其所能只是为本就重复的枝节旁生了许多奇形怪状的枝丫。

    如果非如此叙述呢?哪吒完全可以在对第一部电影的借鉴中发现未曾讲清楚的部分,而不是用同样的故事糊弄观众两遍乃至更多。与之相比公路片的框架应当为这类奇观式电影带来一些启发,即我们不必用表象来征服,而心灵的广阔则更值得玩味。

    Ne Zha 2(2025)

    三、关于结局与彩蛋的进一步批判

    只着眼于情节,《哪吒2》结局的失衡无疑令人大跌眼镜,暂不论它再次落入了第一部中不认命的主题,更是诡异地表现出虚伪的阵势。

    1. 场面虚
      本片对炼丹炉内外的描写极具割裂感,它即体现于部分背景的缺失,比如说对炉外场景表现力的大大削弱。我实在难以摸清那许多禅宗弟子的目的何为?他们既不与天融合,也很难算作是一个方阵。尽管导演有意在哪吒了解真相后与三条龙化作的人物打斗画面做了局部处理,他依旧只是在尽力让两个世界(姑且这么说)保持视觉上的统一。
      回到炉内来说,这种身体的消散也并非漫长,而只是导演未缓和与另一个世界的节奏而构建的不和谐的声音。当我们看到哪吒错误的欣喜自身的胜利时,炉里的怪物还在悠闲地开着玩笑,这种叙事手段只有在过分地重视主要矛盾,而时不时将次要矛盾提到耳边,等到哪吒也真正被关在炉内时,导演这才回想起被他无视已旧的地方。
    2. 感情虚
      在一切闪回中,我们总是在获得旧事重提的无奈感。或许是导演的自大,他竟以为这种形式能够为哪吒的变身积蓄力量,而事实上他让故事更加混乱,以至于把殷夫人的离世又变成了一闪而过的镜头。在我看来,闪回的使用要及其小心地考虑情感的恰当位置,而并非随意地放在重大事件之后,否则就如本片般进行非理性的衔接,提供毫无益处的感情价值。在这一层情感基础被推翻之下,哪吒的变身自然成了空谈,他只是换了一个模样而已。

    彩蛋的出现,让我彻底相信导演对反转的奇怪痴迷,也许近几年在中国大陆掀起的用反转次数做卖点的荒唐现象。总之导演一味地沉浸在他对剧情的任意掌控,甚至无理取闹中。一再地用反转来吓唬观众,申公豹的人生和性格都已经流露出有意想要说明的态度,可终究按下不表,这难道不是导演自大的表现吗?他从未认真地讲好自己的角色,而又不断地着眼于其中一幕的编排。

    四、令人作呕的梗文化植入

    犹记得巴斯特·基顿的喜剧,北野武的喜剧,还有拉杜·裘德的喜剧,他们无不是使用身体喜剧、逻辑喜剧等方法来逗笑观众。而本片用了一种极其低幼的办法——把网上的文化搬运弄到电影来充当笑柄,这难道不是对喜剧的侮辱和捉弄观众的极其劣质的手段吗?每当导演玩一个梗笑话时不禁伤感其受网络毒害之深,以致他把这种做法融入艺术之中。导演越想借梗文化渴望靠近观众,感受到一种差距,越有难以理解的愤怒。

    除以上的问题,我注意到一些观众对本片有侮辱女性等其他问题,且不再做过多阐释。文章的梳理基本涵盖我对这部电影的大致印象。总而言之,这部票房取得极大成功的电影并无任何出彩之处,甚至逊色于绝大多数电影。

    Part Three

    Music Recommendation

    • The Now Now and Never

    Artist:What is your name?

    Release time:2022.7

    • Contemporary Movement

    Artist:Duster

    Release time:2000.8

    Part Four

    短评:《方形》的混乱

    作者:Jack Chain


    《方形》:奇观堆砌的杂乱感

    导演好像沉迷在刻意冲击感官的困境里了,这与全篇通用的慢镜头更形成不可避免的冲击。当我们在偶尔跳转的固定镜头中调动视觉时,导演却用了一位杂技演员来砸他的场,似乎平静的荒诞之下,只呈现出一种粗陋的隔离,令观众感到不知所措。当我们冷静的将视线移向纵深,将男主的身影置身在垃圾堆中时,夸张的视觉却把它带入到垃圾场,这是一种何等荒唐的错位。在本部金棕榈获奖片中,只有一次又一次的爆炸(就像视频中的一样)惊吓着观众,随后又以故作深沉的装置来挽留仅剩的艺术气息。我的思绪正向男主身后的椅子山装置般处于混沌之中,如果艺术片执着于用刻意的人造景观和差劲的装置来诱捕观众的话,它是失败的,即它的一切塑造所支持的影像上,空间没有平衡地洒落在应当分配的位置,而被过剩挤占。

    The Square(2017)

    That’s all I show you in this issue,please subscribe my magazine if you like.Thank you for your reading.

  • We see different skies every month

    As a cinephile,it’s an important thing to watch movies.I hear many people have watched over than 10,000 movies,that’s crazy.

    By the way, I want to show you my most impressed film each month from 2024 to last month.Just see the list below↓

    2024

    Janvier

    Taste of Cherry(1997) by Abbas Kiarostami

    Février

    There Will Be Blood(2001) by Paul Thomas Anderson

    Mars

    The 400 blows(1959) by François Truffaut

    Avril

    The Blue Kite(1993) by Tian Zhuangzhuang

    Mai

    Tokyo Story(1953) by Yasujirô Ozu

    Taste of Cherry(1997)

    Juin

    Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans(1927) by F.W. Murnau

    Juillet

    Pickpocket(1959) by Robert Bresson

    Août

    The Road(1954) by Federico Fellini

    Septembre

    Vitalina Varela(2019) by Pedro Costa

    Octobre

    Gertrud(1964) by Carl Theodor Dreyer

    & News from Home(1993) by Chantal Ackerman

    Novembre

    Wanda(1970) by Barbara Loden

    Décembre

    Maine Ocean(1986) by Jacques Rozier

    2025

    Janvier

    Landscape Suicide(1986) by James Benning

    Février

    Rosa de Areva(1989) by Margarida Cordeiro and António Reis

    Mars

    No Home Movie(2015) by Chantal Ackerman

    Avril

    Inland Empire(2006) by David Lynch

    & Eraserhead(1977) by David Lynch

    Mai

    Rabbits(2002) by David Lynch

    Inland Empire(2006)

    Thanks for your reading.

  • My dreaming scene

    From 2021,I was fascinated by the charm of films,from Stanley Kubrick,Andrei Tarkovsky to Abbas Kiarostami.Well,these famous directors show their extraordinary talents to tell us the beauty of the films.After that,I learned about the new wave in France(la nouvelle vague),I think from that time,my life has connected with films.I bought a lot of film books,which still lie in my bookshelves,and that’s beginning I saw a bright road stretching in front of me.

    Anderi Tarkovsky,a Soviet Union’s director

    Here’s my favorite films from 2021 to 2024,and I hope to watch more miracles this year,like the name of Jonas Mekas’s film,As I Was Moving Ahead Occasionally I Saw Brief Glimpses of Beauty.

    2021

    Drive My Car(2021) by Ryûsuke Hamaguchi

    Memoria(2021) by Apichatpong Weerasethakul

    Old(2021) by M.Night Shyamalan

    Bad Luck Banging or Loony Porn(2021) by Radu Jude

    France(2021) by Bruno Dumont

    Drive My Car(2021)

    2022

    Nope(2022) by Jordan Peele

    EO(2022) by Jerzy Skolimowski

    Where is the Street? or With No Before and After(2022) by João Pedro Rodrigues

    Aftersun(2022) by Charlotte Wells

    R.M.N.(2022) by Cristian Mungiu

    Aftersun(2022)

    2023

    Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World(2023) by Radu Jude

    Closed Your Eyes(2023) by Victor Erich

    La Chimera(2023) by Alice Rohrwacher

    Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell(2023) by Thiên An Pham

    Youth(Spring)(2023) by Wang Bing

    Evil Does Not Exist(2023) by Ryûsuke Hamaguchi

    The Taste of Things(2023) by Anh Hung Tran

    The Delinquents(2023) by Rodrigo Moreno

    Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World(2023)

    2024

    Misericorde(2024) by Alain Guiraudie

    Second Act(2024) by Quentin Dupieux

    Afternoons of Solitude(2024) by Albert Serra

    By the Stream(2024) by Sang-soo Hong

    It’s Not Me(2024) by Leos Carax

    Eephus(2024) by Carson Lund

    You Burn me(2024) by Matías Piñeiro

    SUPER HAPPY FOREVER(2024) by Kihei Igarashi

    Trap(2024) by M.Night Shyamalan

    SUPER HAPPY FOREVER(2024)

    Thank you for your reading.

在 WordPress.com 上免费创建您自己的网站。创建您自己的网站。
免费开始